Saturday, July 17, 2010

Steinbrenner dies, George Costanza suspected

An instant classic from the Weekly World News.

Amplify’d from weeklyworldnews.com
George Steinbrenner, a towering figure in the sports world, died Tuesday morning in Tampa.  George Costanza was arrested soon after in a nearby coffee shop.Read more at weeklyworldnews.com
 

Read more...

Afghan Women choose self immolation over oppression. Media doesn't understand why.

For anything bad that happens around a woman that woman is blamed and punished with the most draconian punishments possible. That appears to be the problem in Afghanistan, and has been a problem for many years. Phyllis Chesler tells the story at Newsreal.

Amplify’d from www.newsrealblog.com

In 1961, I remember meeting a rather genial relative who had come down from the Khyber Pass region to meet me, his first American woman. Apparently, he, too, was a merciful fellow who married his brother’s widow—but then shut her up in solitary. I was told that he fed and clothed her and that this alone saved her from a far more dismal fate. I did not understand then—or now—why this poor widow-wife could not have shared the family tasks and remained among the living. Entombed, buried alive—like Verdi’s great opera hero, Aida. Without a name, without even a number, the fate of this unknown prisoner haunts me still.


These tragedies are no longer confined to Third World countries.

In Afghanistan, the women are setting themselves aflame, choosing an awful, fiery death rather than one more awful beating at the hands of a husband and a mother-in-law. Amazingly, when the mainstream media finally writes about this precise tragedy in Afghanistan, it still carefully manages not to use the words “Muslim” or “Islam.” For example, see Time magazine’s recent coverage of this very subject. And, see my previous pieces on what such “soft censorship” is really about when the American mainstream media consistently fails to describe a Muslim-on-Muslim honor killing in the West as a Muslim-on-Muslim crime but is quick to note Hindu honor killings in India as Hindu-on-Hindu crimes.

In Kabul, when battered women run away, their own families refuse to take them back and the government puts them in jail and treats them as criminals. In a rather moving documentary, “Daughters of Afghanistan,” Sally Armstrong shows us what happened to one young Afghan woman who refused to take the beatings anymore and upon a lawyer’s advice dared return to her family of origin. Her own father clapped her up into solitary, perhaps for the rest of her life, to live in a cold, dark room with one bricked-up window.

Read more at www.newsrealblog.com
 

Read more...

Afghan Women choose self immolation over oppression. Media doesn't understand why.

For anything bad that happens around a woman that woman is blamed and punished with the most draconian punishments possible. That appears to be the problem in Afghanistan, and has been a problem for many years. Phyllis Chesler tells the story at Newsreal.

Amplify’d from www.newsrealblog.com

In 1961, I remember meeting a rather genial relative who had come down from the Khyber Pass region to meet me, his first American woman. Apparently, he, too, was a merciful fellow who married his brother’s widow—but then shut her up in solitary. I was told that he fed and clothed her and that this alone saved her from a far more dismal fate. I did not understand then—or now—why this poor widow-wife could not have shared the family tasks and remained among the living. Entombed, buried alive—like Verdi’s great opera hero, Aida. Without a name, without even a number, the fate of this unknown prisoner haunts me still.


These tragedies are no longer confined to Third World countries.

In Afghanistan, the women are setting themselves aflame, choosing an awful, fiery death rather than one more awful beating at the hands of a husband and a mother-in-law. Amazingly, when the mainstream media finally writes about this precise tragedy in Afghanistan, it still carefully manages not to use the words “Muslim” or “Islam.” For example, see Time magazine’s recent coverage of this very subject. And, see my previous pieces on what such “soft censorship” is really about when the American mainstream media consistently fails to describe a Muslim-on-Muslim honor killing in the West as a Muslim-on-Muslim crime but is quick to note Hindu honor killings in India as Hindu-on-Hindu crimes.

In Kabul, when battered women run away, their own families refuse to take them back and the government puts them in jail and treats them as criminals. In a rather moving documentary, “Daughters of Afghanistan,” Sally Armstrong shows us what happened to one young Afghan woman who refused to take the beatings anymore and upon a lawyer’s advice dared return to her family of origin. Her own father clapped her up into solitary, perhaps for the rest of her life, to live in a cold, dark room with one bricked-up window.

Read more at www.newsrealblog.com
 

Read more...

Why did the US Gov shut down all 73K blogs on Blogetery.com?

This is very early in this story, and very alarming. China has been exerting this sort of pressure on blog hosts that have chinese citizen blogs on them. Why would the US shut down every single blog, even the innocent ones, on a free wordpress blog provider?



h/t: John Jay Ray

Amplify’d from www.helium.com
Recently targeted by federal action, the free WordPress blogging site Blogetery abruptly came offline after hosting provider BurstNet complied with undisclosed demands from authorities. A message viewable upon visiting the Blogetery site gives this message from its owner: "After being BurstNet customer for 7 months our server was terminated without any notification or explanation.” A link on the site leads to a forum called Web Hosting Talk, where the site operator has posted correspondence with BurstNet, that suggests feederal involvement in the incident. Read more at www.helium.com
 

Read more...

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Is there a Right to Healthcare?

According to long established tradition in the English common law, and as explained by the eminent Blackstone, the three rights in the Declaration of Independence are as follows.

Life is the right to live, intact with one's limbs, eyes, and organs. Any physical damage that cripples or removes a limb, or eyes, or kills one violates this right. This definition was important because according to the common law people had the right to defend themselves with lethal force if they were under threat of losing life or limb.

Liberty is the right to move about freely. Any false imprisonment, clapping into slavery, or kidnapping violates this right. Once again, under the common law people had the right to defend themselves with lethal force if they are under threat of losing their liberty.

Property is the right to keep the fruits of one's own labor, including items that are improved from their natural state, and to transfer the rights to this property to others as one wishes. If people become wealthy through their hard work, they can trade for the things they like, buy and sell items, and pass property on to charities or family as they wish. This is also known as the Right to the Pursuit of Happiness, because if happiness is brought nearer by a life without hardships, and hard work and the accumulation of property leads to a life without undue hardships, then they are one and the same. Certainly people cannot be happy if they are forced to constantly struggle in abject poverty for food, a bed, and a roof over their head.

Those with nothing to their name, newcomers and the bankrupt can always start building up wealth with their bare hands and their innate inventiveness. Anyone can. Nobody said it was easy to become wealthy, but with property rights it is possible. Without property rights it will never be possible for the poor to rise out of poverty. The best they can hope for without equal property rights is a few pennies thrown their way by their 'betters' in the elite classes to make their poverty slightly less miserable, and maybe free beer on holidays so they forget their misery as they also lose their drive to succeed. The question though is whether it is desirable for people to live in poverty and misery, even if it is alleviated by government charity. Shouldn't they be allowed and encouraged to lift themselves out of poverty instead? Shouldn't they have property rights allowing them to rise from poverty?

It is as plain as the nose on your face. If you punch your nose with your fist, you will have a nosebleed. It is your responsibility to stop the bleeding. It is your responsibility to clean up the blood after. By the fact of having punched your own nose, you are responsible for the fact of the results. And if you are responsible for an injury, whether to yourself or another, you are responsible for the remedy to it.


As even the most obstinate slaveholders learned in the War Between the States that ended the Peculiar Institution of Slavery, when rights conflict, for instance the right of a slaveholder to his property conflicting with the rights of a human to go where he wants and keep the fruits of his own labor, humans do not have rights to the life, liberty, or property of other humans.

This was never all that controversial. The controversial part was in defining who was human. Eventually all Americans came to the true conclusion that the differences between the different human races were cosmetic. Under the skin we all were, are, and forever will be members of the human race.

If healthcare were a right, which it is not, what would that mean? First, if Able has a right to healthcare, Dr. Baker must supply his labor to Able (violates Property rights). Second, Dr. Baker cannot move about freely, because he is required to serve Able (violates Liberty rights). And Dr. Baker's property rights in his medical learning, his medical practice, and his office are seized for Able's needs (more violations of Property rights). Dr. Baker serves Able, just as all doctors serve patients now, but Dr. Baker no longer has a choice of whether to serve Able. Now he is placed in involuntary service. Another phrase for involuntary service is involuntary servitude. And that is equal to bondage or slavery. Dr. Baker must be a slave if Able has a right to healthcare!

And that is why the right to healthcare is not a right. Because if it is a right then it places all the Dr. Bakers into slavery. No right can place another person into slavery. Such rights are illegitimate.

What is healthcare really? It is a responsibility that goes with being alive. If you are alive, you have the responsibility to stay healthy. There is no argument possible about it. You can exercise. Nobody else can exercise for you. You can eat right. Nobody else can eat for you. You can pay attention to wounds and diseases. Nobody else knows how you feel until you tell them. Nobody has any responsibility for your body other than you. You do.

And that is the underlying reason we are having this discussion. The Christianity-hating progressive movement could not reinvent society following reason alone without acknowledging God, has therefore abandoned reason entirely, and now denies that individuals have responsibility for their selves and their actions.

The Truth is obvious to those who look. Don't be afraid to see what you see and say so.

This post was inspired by A Well-Reasoned Perspective on the "Right" to Health Care, by Amy Miller and Ryan Kazmierczak. Read here for more on rights and duties.
beaglescout-48.jpg

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Read more...

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Mind-Reading, Canadian Hate Speech Criminals Protest Ann Coulter Hate Speech Before She Speaks It, and Threaten Injury and Mayhem

Canadians are so polite it's just amazing. For example, the other day Ann Coulter received a letter from a provost at the University of Ottawa warning her to watch her mouth or she might be arrested and thrown in the hoosegow. The interesting part went like this.

Canadian law puts reasonable limits on the freedom of expression. For example, promoting hatred against any identifiable group would not only be considered inappropriate, but could in fact lead to criminal charges. Outside of the criminal realm, Canadian defamation laws also limit freedom of expression and may differ somewhat from those to which you are accustomed. I therefore ask you, while you are a guest on our campus, to weigh your words with respect and civility in mind.

There is a strong tradition in Canada, including at this university, of restraint, respect and consideration in expressing even provocative and controversial opinions and urge you to respect that Canadian tradition while on our campus. Hopefully, you will understand and agree that what may, at first glance, seem like unnecessary restrictions to freedom of expression do, in fact, lead not only to a more civilized discussion, but to a more meaningful, reasoned and intelligent one as well.

Ann Coulter responded with musings about how she would file a Hate Speech complaint, including in a letter to the Ottawa Citizen:
The provost simply believes and is publicizing his belief that conservatives are more likely to commit hate crimes in their speeches. Not only does this promote hatred against conservatives, but it promotes violence against conservatives. [link]

Read more...

Monday, March 1, 2010

Interesting Articles from the Interwebz: 1 Mar 2010

The Captain's Journal, The Media, the New Media, and U. S. Intelligence
  • Takeaway: DoD Intelligence is finally recognizing the usefulness of open source intelligence and accurate history as practiced by bloggers sitting in basements, and as compared with the relative uselessness of politicized intelligence coming from the official US intelligence community.
Shannon Love at Chicago Boyz, Why Alternative Power is and will Remain Useless
  • Quote: There exists no alternative energy source, no combination of alternative energy sources, and no system of combinations of alternative energy sources that can fully replace a single, coal fired electric plant built with 1930s era technology.
Shannon Love at Chicago Boyz, Does the President actually understand the Concept of Insurance?
  • Quote: Liability insurance pays for the damage that you might do to the property and lives of others. Comprehensive pays to repair the damage to your own car. The law requires that you protect the rights of others, it doesn’t require that pay for your own car in any particular way. Everybody knows this.
  • Takeaway: Everybody except Obama.
Gateway Pundit, Upward Bound is Down... Radical Sexual Indoctrination of Kids is In
  • Upward Bound, which has a 95% rate of rehabilitating at-risk youth and getting them to graduate from four-year colleges, is being cut. Funding to teach fisting in schools is being increased.
  • Takeaway: Jennings and GLSEN want homosexual, bisexual and transgender themes taught in every subject at every grade, all the way down to the kindergarten level, maybe even preschool.
Gateway Pundit, 12th Imam Appears, gets arrested by Iranian Regime
  • On Friday during the local Friday sermon, in the southern Iranian city of Bandar Abbass, a young man presented himself as the Mahdi and claimed to have been sent by God to bring enlightenment and blessings to people. Soon after this however he was arrested by agents of the revolutionary guards.
Belmont Club, Masters of the Unvierse
  • Are interstellar aliens likely to be peacemongering progressives, or somewhat more ruthless?
Robert LeFevre at Mises.org, The Birth of a Man
  • Takeaway: What is needed is a Declaration of Individual Independence
Liz Blaine at Newsreal, How to Beat Leftists and Astroturfers
  • While lurking the web I ran across a set of videos that fall into the “must view” category for conservatives this year. Recorded during Conservative New Media’s workshop the videos focus on tactics used by leftists and astroturfers during the 2008 primaries and election, and methods to defeat them.
Technorati Tags: ,

Read more...

Thursday, January 28, 2010

The Great Lie of Partisan Tolerance

Herbert Marcuse's Progressive Legacy of Political Correctness, Multiculturalism, Hate and Mendacity

The Free Dictionary defines 'tolerance' as follows.
tol·er·ance
1. The capacity for or the practice of recognizing and respecting the beliefs or practices of others.

That's what tolerance used to mean, before Orwellian progressives performed their cunning linguistic tricks on it. Now the class-obsessed left has divided tolerance into two classes: partisan (good) and repressive (bad). The dirty secret is that both their meanings are identical and neither one is real tolerance.









Marcuse was part of the Frankfurt School, aka Institute for Social Research, that was founded at the University of Frankfurt am Main, moved first to Geneva, and then to Columbia University in NYC. ISR was the fountainhead for the post-modern Marxist pseudoscience of sociology, along with all the various "studies" curricula. The ISR/Frankfurt School was intimately involved in 20th century efforts to reverse the meaning of language and abandon standards of objective truth.

It all started with Herbert Marcuse, the Marxist theoretician, who decried “repressive tolerance” that doesn’t take sides (or maybe it takes the side of tradition. This is confused in the essay.) and advocated its replacement with “partisan tolerance” that takes sides against the status quo, which means taking sides against anyone who isn't a partisan "victim," or even better an actual outlaw.

From the introduction to Marcuse's 1965 essay (emphasis mine):
THIS essay examines the idea of tolerance in our advanced industrial society. The conclusion reached is that the realization of the objective of tolerance would call for intolerance toward prevailing policies, attitudes, opinions, and the extension of tolerance to policies, attitudes, and opinions which are outlawed or suppressed. In other words, today tolerance appears again as what it was in its origins, at the beginning of the modern period--a partisan goal, a subversive liberating notion and practice. Conversely, what is proclaimed and practiced as tolerance today, is in many of its most effective manifestations serving the cause of oppression.

The author is fully aware that, at present, no power, no authority, no government exists which would translate liberating tolerance into practice, but he believes that it is the task and duty of the intellectual to recall and preserve historical possibilities which seem to have become utopian possibilities--that it is his task to break the concreteness of oppression in order to open the mental space in which this society can be recognized as what it is and does.

Marcuse reaches his conclusions by purposefully misreading Locke and by assuming his own conclusions (e.g. he literally accepts as a postulate that the status quo ante is 'evil'). But this is not the place to indulge in a long argument against Marcuse. Any reader with a lick of common sense who reads Marcuse's essay will realize it is packed full of learned lies and rhetorical and subliminal trickery. The takeaway of his argument is the conclusion that all things that have been outlawed or suppressed by society, including murder, rape, and robbery, and all matter of perversion and anti-social behavior, are good things that should be accepted, while every single traditional value or person must be rejected militantly.

To him, tradition is the enemy.

Let us take a minute to think about tradition.

In modern society we appreciate science and the scientific or empirical method. Through experiments, the scientist makes changes in things and observes them to see what happens. He formulates hypotheses and theories in response to physical facts. When a new process is discovered, formalized, and replicated by other scientists then it becomes a generally accepted scientific theory, and is also accepted by all manner of engineers and inventors as a formula to do something useful.

Not only does science work that way, so does tradition. People start from a beginning point, and over years, decades, centuries, and millennia they experiment with different ways of doing things. When they find a way to achieve better results, better facts, the improved way spreads to others. The origin of some innovations may be obscured in folkways, but the more obscure their origins the more you can trust that they were empirically tested and retested over time by people, not invented by rulers and priests who have always written down their commandments. Eventually survival-enhancing best practices beat out the alternatives. Over macro-scale time, except where overridden by a tyrant's fiat, a society's tradition becomes the repository of all the best practices empirically formulated by the members of society.

The common law is a tradition.

Tradition is, quite literally, the true science of sociology. The freer the society, the better the science in society's traditions. The less free, the worse.

Tolerance is a best practice of a free society. The whole point of tolerance is that it lets groups of free people live with each other even when they disagree, without one group needing to defeat the other and place them into subservience. But in Marcuse's formulation the purpose of tolerance is to enforce the beliefs of the group in charge, and to punish conflicting beliefs of their subjects. Marcuse's formulation assumes an unfree society, with one annointed aristocracy ruling over another, lesser class of serfs. And his answer is to reverse the formulation so that the serf class becomes militantly intolerant toward the aristocracy and revolts against it.

Partisan Tolerance explicitly inverts every single moral and social good in American and Western European culture and society.

The Peaceniks are Revolting

What happens when one group of people, in a free society without class barriers or defenses against revolution, unilaterally decides to revolt against the whole system? Well, either they fail or succeed. We lived through this process in the USA with the violent, millenarian upheavals of the 1960s and their peace-mongering pipe-dream of creating a heaven on earth where there is no more war and the lion lays down in peace with the lamb. Unfortunately, in the real world the lion lunched on the lamb, the tiger mauled his trainer, the environmentalist's lawsuits shuttered the factories and put all the factory laborers out of work, millions of innocents were murdered by the "peaceful" communists in Cambodia and Vietnam, welfare for poor families created a plague of drugs and violence, and the violent revolutionaries of the 1960s failed to overthrow American society. So SDS and the Weathermen and their drug-addled cronies put away their guns and bombs, went to grad school like Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn did, and burrowed into the universities and colleges where they began to indoctrinate college students whose brains had been turned into receptive mush by the infantilizing, prison-like, government monopoly schools and their guild-like teacher's unions. Others went into entertainment, law, social work, the environmental movement, and government. And finally there were those, like Bill and Hillary Clinton, who went into the Democratic Party for the 1968 Democratic convention and took the party over in time for McGovern's doomed 1972 run.

Political Correctness

Political correctness arose from these people. Originally something of a cynical joke about the uniformity enforcing effects of political power, then sold to us as a kind of little white lie to paper over hurt feelings, it quickly became a way of enforcing partisan tolerance. In other words, political correctness is a lie that replaces the truth with a partisan political lie in order to gain a partisan political advantage. Why doesn't the press call someone caught red-handed in a plane full of people while lighting himself on fire in a fumbled attempt to set off a bomb a terrorist, but calls him an alleged terrorist instead?--Political correctness. Why can't you call an aggressive pan-handling bum who urinates on the sidewalk and cusses at every passer-by crazy? Why does every infringement of your freedom and the freedom of your children seem to be "for the children"? Why is abortion called a woman's issue, or a reproductive rights issue, or free choice, rather than homicide, dismemberment and disposal of defenseless children in the womb? Why did Congress pass a hate crimes law in 2009 that protects dangerous perverts like pedophiles and bestialists from "hate speech" and provides  punishments for those who call them the wrong words, while with-holding this privileged status from members of the military who face identically hateful mistreatment? Why do progressives wear fashionable portraits of despicable tyrants and mass murderers such as Arafat, Che and Mao on their tee shirts while claiming these monsters somehow stood for freedom? Political correctness and Partisan Tolerance are the reasons.

The truth is that Partisan Tolerance and Political Correctness are nothing more than Lies in a web of lies promoted by revolutionary communists, socialists, fascists, Democrats, and other progressives. The source of these lies is as old as humanity: he is the Father of Lies, the Lord of the Flies, Beelzebub, the Serpent.

Is that all?

Partisan Tolerance does not stop at Political Correctness, or even Multiculturalism, though that is where we most often see it. It is truly perverse. In the progressives' Newspeak dictionary, freedom means total government control of everyone, justice means treating privileged minorities better than non-preferred groups, property is not the means by which individuals suffice for themselves and escape bondage to others but the means of oppression, equal treatment before the law is replaced with legally-enforced equal misery for all, those who create great products and employ vast numbers of people are treated like criminals and perverts, and the most fundamental right of all, the right to life, can be invalidated by another's right to privacy or convenience.

Here are a few more examples...

  1. Some critical theorists (this means communist in the progressive secret code) justify censorship of the arts based on the Marcusean idea of partisan tolerance.

  2. We have an explanation for why according to Democrats, any argument by a black person always beats an argument by a white person, as long as the black person is a Democrat. If the black person is not a Democrat, like Clarence Thomas or Condoleezza Rice, s/he is not authentically black and must be demonized and personally destroyed by all "good" progressives.

  3. We have a response to a court decision in Belgium that declares that suppression or oppression of majority views is not legally objectionable. This is exactly the same structure as existed in apartheid South Africa: The minority oppressed the majority. In other words, apartheid is allowable as long as it is not against the wrong majority.

  4. We have the example of San Francisco, where law abiding, productive citizens are oppressed by the official bureaucracy while the same bureaucracy refuses to enforce laws against criminals and those who can claim the privileges of "victim" status. Are you an illegal alien and a criminal? You will get treated with kid gloves, while a businessman who wants to turn a profit so he can grow his company and employ more people is  taxed to the brink of failure.

  5. We have all the ways that Progressives lie, mislead and cheat to get out of losing arguments.


Is partisan tolerance simple hypocrisy? I would argue it is worse. It is not simply stupid hypocrisy. It is an organized LIE that turns the categories of truth and lie on their heads, makes words meaningless, and prevents understanding between people. It is an attack on language and understanding and against reason and the intelligence of everyone in society, whether they pay attention to this or not. It is the willful infliction of the chaos at the Tower of Babel on the whole world, in order to bring us to a perfect, pre-linguistic, communist paradise that never existed and is fundamentally inhumane. It is the Lie.

It is the Lie, and all too many Democrats believe in the Lie as hard as they can. They cannot see it is a lie, because they have trained themselves to not see anything for what it is, but only see what fits into their preconceived, partisan politically correct categories.

What's this mean for us?

One of our jobs as responsible, clear seeing adults is to recognize political correctness and partisan tolerance wherever we see them, identify them by name as a LIE, reject them forcefully, and ridicule and demolish the arguments of any and everyone who advances these destructive memes. We have to make it personal. We have to hurt their feelings.

And maybe that's the hardest part. Because we are nice. Because we don't want to turn into mirror images of the hateful, horrible douchebags who are the attack dogs of the Democratic Party.

But even though this is not a fighting war, this is none-the-less a civil war for the culture and soul of America and to maintain the last best hope for real freedom in the rest of the world.

The Alternative

The alternative to struggle and victory is surrender and loss. The result for those in an America where we lose will be, as George Orwell so eloquently wrote:
If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever.

That's what is at stake. Life in a world where everyone is forced to believe lies or pretend to, where right and wrong are turned upside down, where none but the political aristocracy are free in any meaningful sense of the word, and where a single terrible tyrant holds the lives of all in his all-powerful, all-corrupt fist. Though we often say that socialism and tyranny don't work, the dirty secret is that once freedom has been thrown on the trash heap they do work. They have worked for most of human history, when men and women were not free but were slaves of their kings and emperors. Most people are miserable in these societies, but such societies are stable and aside from occasional violent revolts, pogroms, wars, and oppressions, life goes on. That is how socialism, fascism, monarchism, and other forms of tyranny function, by forcing the vast mass of people into equal misery.

How many generations will it take to restore freedom if we go down that road? And will we die in the transitional struggles, waste away in jails, or will we die, old and full of regrets, as slaves who through our forbearance sold our fellows and descendants into slavery?

Militantly opposing the LIE of partisan tolerance, all the lies of progressive Newspeak, is not the only thing we must do. But it is something we all must do. Because truth will set us free, as long as we are able to know it when we see it.

beaglescout-48.jpg


Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Read more...

Monday, January 25, 2010

Obama the Taxman

One of the best videos ever!




h/t: Newsreal

beaglescout-48.jpg


Technorati Tags: , ,

Read more...

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Jackson and Harrison County Mississippi Sign the Voter ID Petition

All over the US, especially in big cities but it happens in small towns too, people apparently rise up out of certain graveyards to vote every four years. This has has probably always happened, but this is 2010 and we don't have to allow vote fraud to continue into the 21st century.

If you are allowed to vote, then your vote should be counted. If your vote is not counted, then it's just as if you were stopped from voting. If a person gets to vote twice, that is the same exact thing as taking away someone else's vote. If a person votes a dozen times at a dozen precincts, a dozen people have their votes stolen from them. One of them could have been you! There is nothing funny or innocent about vote fraud. No matter how rare it is, each time it happens it takes away a person's Constitutionally granted power to vote. And each time it happens, the frustration over vote fraud convinces another person that voting is useless. If too many Americans come to believe their votes don't count because of fraud, then the possibility of revolution by other means becomes very real. Those are the stakes. Those are the reasons why preventing vote fraud is important.

There is a non-partisan Voter ID Petition going on in Mississippi. Currently Mississippi state law prohibits poll workers from asking for or checking a photo ID to make sure that every voter is who she says she is. Coupled with the inability of cities and towns to clear the voter rolls of people who die, this leaves a wide-open field for fraudulent voting. The only way fraudulent voters get caught is if they come back to the same precinct to vote under a second name and one of the poll workers or watchers remembers them and calls them on it. The current petition is to put a question on the 2010 general election ballot that lets the people of Mississippi decide if they want to require Voter ID to prevent vote fraud.

We are very close to our statewide goal of 130 thousand signatures. We will be out in force on the home stretch trying to cross that finish line before January 31, 2010.

Pick up a petition and take it to your job, your school, or your church. Get your friends to sign up. Pick-up and drop-off locations for petitions can be found below. So can some good advice on how to answer questions you might get about the petition.

Jackson County Pick-up/Drop-off Locations:
  • Ocean Springs:  Miner's Toy Store, Washington Avenue
  • Gautier:  Coldwell-Banker Realty, Hwy 90
  • Gautier:  Sleep King, Hwy 90
  • Gautier:  David Thompson (at bank between McDonald's & Wendys on Highway 90 – ask for David)
  • Pascagoula:  Anderson's Bakery, Market Street
  • Pascagoula:  Sleep King, Denny Avenue
  • Vancleave: Coles Service Center, Poticaw Bayou Road
  • Wade/Hurley/Big Point area: Farm Bureau Insurance, 16913 Highway 63 (10 miles north of I-10, 1 mile north of the power plant, 4 miles south of Wade-Vancleave Rd.)
Harrison County Pick-up/Drop-off Locations:
  • Sweet Pepper's Deli on the west side of Hwy. 49 in Saucier.  Ask for David or Joyce.
  • Comvest Properties on Beauvoir Rd. in Biloxi.  Across from Autozone. 
  • Vintage Station on Courthouse Rd. in Gulfport.  After 5pm.  Just north of the railroad.
  • Bernie's restaurant in Biloxi.
  • Hallmark Mortgage on Cowan Rd. in Gulfport.  Just north of Hwy. 90.
  • Palazzo CPA's.  1/2 mile north of I-10 at exit 41/Woolmarket.
  • Any Sleep King location.  Denny Ave. in Pascagoula.  Eisenhower Dr. in Biloxi.  Hwy. 49 in Gulfport next to Best Buy.  Dedeaux Rd. in Gulfport, 1 mile east of Hwy. 49.  Hwy. 90 in Gautier.  Pass Rd. in Gulfport, next to Center Point Energy.  Sangani Blvd. in D'Iberville next to Lowe's.

Petition Guidelines:

  • Official petition forms are 2-sided legal size. Sheet must have printing on back to be valid. Use official forms.

  • Print name and address as listed on voter rolls (Clerk compares name and address to voter rolls to certify each signature).

  • Yes, petition signers need to be registered to vote in Mississippi for their signatures to count.
  • No P.O. Boxes.

  • Black or blue ink is OK.

  • Don't worry about precinct or congressional district (not necessary)

  • Keep different counties on separate sheets.

  • Sign at the bottom of the sheet as the circulator.

  • Deliver completed sheets to drop-off points AS THEY ARE COMPLETED (we want to avoid a bottleneck at the Clerks's office). Our deadline for turning in sheets to the drop-off points is January 31st.

Frequently Asked Questions
  • Some people will object to signing a political petition, saying they don't want news to get back to their boss, or to face political retaliation. Answer: We are going to have at least 130,000 signatures on this petition. Nobody is going to go through all these thousands of sheets of paper to check to see if your name is on it.

  • Careful signers may point out there is an exception for people who have religious objections to having their photograph taken and object to this. Answer: I totally understand where you're coming from, and if I had my druthers I'd prefer that too. However, the lawyers tell us that if we didn't have this exception in the legal language, the first legal challenge based on a religious objection would overturn the law.

beaglescout-48.jpg

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Read more...

  © Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP