Now everyone who is paying attention knows the wages of lying instead of telling the truth when you are a news magazine. ABC, CBS, NBC, look at this and see the future of your news organizations.
Meet Peter J. Corrigan for OH US #10 against Kucinich http://amplify.com/u/c0yn #tcot #ocra http://amplify.com/u/c0yt
Read more...Republicans have the chance this election cycle to elect more qualified and effective black Republican representatives and senators than have been elected in one year since the Reconstruction period.
If the progressive media adds 10-15% to Democrat numbers by way of all the free advertising in the guise of "news", then voter fraud typically adds 3-5% to Democrat numbers on voting day. This article is a comprehensive look at how voting fraud works in the US.
If you care about whether every legitimate vote counts, read the entire article.
Byron York writes about why the OneNation socialist union march on October 2 fell flat.
Americans all across the country in right-to-work states don't have to join unions if they don't want to. In non-right-to-work states if the union takes control of their workplace they can be fired for not paying union dues. Democrats are planning to make all 50 states non-right-to-work states. If this happens, then workers will not have the opportunity to stay out of a union. The union will organize, and those who don't want to join the union or whom the union dislikes will not be able to keep their jobs.
Democrats and Unions HATE Right-To-Work States, because in those states workers are free to join the union OR NOT. And that choice is one that Democrats and Unions do not believe American Workers should be allowed to make. Anti-Choice: Who would have expected that?!
Currently, there are 22 states in the U.S. that have laws where workers who are employed at companies that are unionized have a choice whether or not to join or pay the union. These states are known as Right-to-Work states.
On the other hand, in the 28 Non-Right-to-Work states (also called forced-dues states), it is legal for a union to negotiate a “union (income) security clause” that requires all workers covered by the union to pay the union dues or ‘agency fees’ as a condition of employment. If the workers refuse to pay the union, under a “union (income) security clause,” the union can have them fired from their jobs.
As background, in 1947, Congress amended the National Labor Relations Act with the Taft-Hartley Amendments which, among other things, gave states the right to establish “Right-to-Work” laws. Until the Taft-Hartley Amendments, from 1935 to 1947, private-sector workers in all 50 could be required to pay dues to a union or, if not, be fired from their jobs. The ability of states to have Right-to-Work laws is contained in a single paragraph within the National Labor Relations Act (Section 14 [b]), which states:
(b) [Agreements requiring union membership in violation of State law] Nothing in this Act [subchapter] shall be construed as authorizing the execution or application of agreements requiring membership in a labor organization as a condition of employment in any State or Territory in which such execution or application is prohibited by State or Territorial law.
As a result of this one section being inserted into the 1947 amendments, states (through their legislatures) could determine whether or not to be a Right-to-Work state, or a forced-dues state. Therefore, the removal of this one section would make all 50 states forced-dues states, giving unions the ability to have workers fired for not paying union dues or fees.
Read more at www.redstate.com
Very nice video from Joe Dan Media by way of viralfootage.com
As Terrence Moore points out in this essay, the Republican Pledge to America is more of a temporary than a permanent document. It describes those things that Republicans can attempt to do right now, before the newly elected Congressmen and Senators are seated in Jan 2011. But what Conservatives need to do, as they take over control of the Republican Party from the big government Republicans who are dominant in the legislature now, is institute a long-term party platform and plan that is based on the same first principles as animated the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence and, in fact, the American Revolution of 1776. To these ends, Moore starts with these paragraphs.
Read the whole thing.
Human beings are individuals. They are born not into a class or a race or a special interest but into the human community. The American ideal has always been to treat individuals not as belonging to preferred classes or groups but as individuals. Attempts to categorize and hyphenate individuals, particularly for political purposes, are far from being American.
Human beings are endowed with considerable capacities. They have the capacity to think, to work, to provide for themselves, and to pursue their own happiness. Therefore, they have the ability and the responsibility to govern themselves, both in the individual and the collective sense. Policies that treat human beings as wards of the state rather than as human beings capable of taking care of and governing themselves are not American.
Human beings are endowed with inalienable rights. These rights include life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and the protection of private property. These rights come from God, not from government.
The chief end of government is to protect individual, inalienable rights. Rights are not to be confused with entitlements. A person’s rights are derived from being human, from the individual’s effort and talents, and from the self-evident principle that a person might use or save or give away his property as he sees fit. Entitlements are alleged benefits that government transfers from one class of people to another under the guise of “welfare” or “care” or “security” but usually for political gain. Government possesses neither life nor liberty nor happiness nor health and therefore cannot grant rights, only protect them. For the first century and a half of the American experiment, the government mostly protected citizens’ rights. For almost the last century, there has been a deliberate conflation of and confusion between rights and entitlements. The restoration of sound government in our time means a return of government to protecting rights rather than providing entitlements.
The protection of private property is particularly important in America. The American Revolution resulted in large part from a distant government’s cavalier attitude to property rights. James Madison, known as the Father of the Constitution, described the purpose of the government in protecting property as follows:
The diversity in the faculties of men, from which the rights of property originate, is not less an insuperable obstacle to an uniformity of interests. The protection of these faculties, is the first object of government.
In light of Madison’s ideas of constitutional government, contemporary attacks upon “the rich” used to pass progressive (i.e. unequal and often confiscatory) tax and fiscal policies are particularly insidious. The “diversity in the faculties of men” will unavoidably result in some amassing considerable wealth. The laws of political economy tell us that a rising tide, however, lifts all boats. The more opportunity “the rich” have in investing capital in productive enterprise, the higher those boats will rise.
Read more at biggovernment.com
Have fun at your march, all you bought and paid for lackeys of the government monopoly unions and the other organizations bent on reversing the Revolution of 1776 and putting America under an aristocracy once again.
Posts
All Comments
© Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008
Back to TOP
