Friday, August 6, 2010
Distorting the Enlightenment
The meanings of words matter. Sometimes the accretions of years of misunderstandings and deliberate distortions need to be discarded, with extreme prejudice even.
While the Enlightenment, ‘one of the most important shifts in the history of man’ as one recent account put it, has certainly had its detractors, who blame it for anything from the Holocaust to soulless consumerism, it now also has a veritable army of self-styled heirs. Militant secularists, New Atheists, advocates of evidence-based policy, human rights champions… each constituency in their turn will draw justification from the intellectual emanations of that period beginning roughly towards the end of the seventeenth century and culminating – some say ending – in the 1789 French Revolution and its aftermath. And each in their turn will betray it.
It is not deliberate treachery. This is no reactionary dissimulation – it is more impulsive than that. Still, in the hands of the neo-Enlightened, from the zealously anti-religious to the zealously pro-science, something strange has happened. Principles that were central – albeit contested – to the Enlightenment have been reversed, turned in on themselves. Secularism, as we have seen recently in the French government’s decision to ban the burqa, has been transformed from state toleration of religious beliefs into their selective persecution; scientific knowledge, having been emancipated from theology, has now become the politician’s article of faith; even freedom itself, that integral Enlightenment impulse, has been reconceived as the enemy of the people. As the Enlightened critics of Enlightenment naivete would have it, in the symbolic shapes of our ever distending guts and CO2-belching cars, we may be a little too free.
Read more at the-classic-liberal.com
Read more...
Mention Pam Gorman to everyone you know in Arizona http://amplify.com/u/8ew4 #tcot http://amplify.com/u/8ew5
Read more...Thursday, August 5, 2010
Freedom is the Goal defined in the Declaration of Independence. Limited Government is the Way defined in the Constitution. http://amplify.com/u/8dxz
Read more...It’s Pamela Gorman's Got Brass Balls Day!
Acknowledge the awesome that is Pamela Gorman.
Read more...
I Want Your Money - Movie Trailers - iTunes
Whose money is the all-Democrat all the time US government spending? Yours. Your children's. Your grandchildren's. And on, and on, and on, without end.
Read more...
Material girl Michelle Obama is a modern-day Marie Antoinette on a glitzy Spanish vacation
New York Times admits Breitbart told truth and Times told lies
Now it's time for the rest of the media that spread the slanderous racist narrative about the TEA Parties to admit they were lying too, in order to help Democrats distract America from the terrible Democrat record on the economy, the wars, and everything else in what looks like a monumental election year.
Buried at the bottom of a story published the other day, the New York Times printed a curious little correction:
The Political Times column last Sunday, about a generational divide over racial attitudes, erroneously linked one example of a racially charged statement to the Tea Party movement. While Tea Party supporters have been connected to a number of such statements, there is no evidence that epithets reportedly directed in March at Representative John Lewis, Democrat of Georgia, outside the Capitol, came from Tea Party members.
Let’s go over that again:
- The Times is admitting that there is absolutely no evidence that any epithets were shouted at the Congressman by any member of the Tea Party.
- This correction demonstrates we have finally proven our point to the nation’s most eminent and influential liberal media organ: that Rep. Andre Carson lied when he told the AP that members of the Tea Party hurled the “N-word” 15 times during the March 20 health-care rally that took place at the U.S. Capitol.
That’s great, as far as it goes – a thorough vindication of the Tea Party — but it doesn’t go far enough.
Read more at bigjournalism.com
- It’s not enough for the Times to make a correction having let that calumny sit out there unrebuked for weeks and months and then, way after the fact, issue a correction.
- It’s not enough because the Times continues to imply that something racially charged might happened on the steps of the Capitol, when we have shown conclusively, via multiple videos of the moment in question, that nothing of the sort occurred.
Read more...
Sunday, August 1, 2010
Attack on Electoral College Leads to Vote Fraud
Some states have more vote fraud than others. It's clear that some, for instance Illinois, Missouri, Washington, Nevada and New York, have tons and tons of it while others don't have so much. Eliminating the electoral college, as some in Massachusetts advocate, would allow vote fraud in one state to negate and overbalance legitimate voting in other states. It's bad enough when vote fraud in one state negates legitimate votes in that state, but when unlimited vote fraud in one state negates legitimate votes in multiple other states that makes things even worse. By removing the barriers between states and their votes, it renders illegitimate the entire national vote when a single state's vote has been corrupted by collusion between political party and state government.
Read more...
Doctors for Patient Care favor repeal of Obamacare
Listen to what some real doctors say about what needs to be done.
Docs 4 Patient Care is a group of doctors who are fighting fiercely to repeal Obamacare, or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). For months now, they have been quietly waging war against socialized medicine without much help or recognition. However, on July 27th, Dr. Mark Neerhof (a member of Doctors 4 Patient Care) sparred with Dr. Arnold Widen (a doctor in favor of Obamacare) in a no holds barred debate on a Chicago radio station that was moderated by Milton Rosenberg.
Dr. Neerhof comes out swinging in the beginning of the debate by pounding the other side with a plethora of facts. Specifically, Dr. Neerhof uses Massachusetts as a template for the perils of socialized medicine, since government run health care in MA is now proving to be a disastrous idea.
Neerhof begins by pointing out the following facts–
*Obamacare is destructive to the overall quality of health care.
*MA now has the highest health insurance premiums in the country.
*MA now has the longest wait times to see a doctor (in Boston it is now 70 days to see an OBGYN, whereas it used to be 40 days).
*MA has experienced an enormous increase in volume in the ER since they’ve instituted government run health care.
*Eighteen out of thirty-four million Americans that the PPACA now covers will simply be placed on Medicaid, which will drown the states in debt. (IL is already almost bankrupt.)
*Obamacare is destined to fail. Three quarters of insurers in MA are, now, going bankrupt and are begging to increase their rates–it is the only way that they can afford to cover people with pre-existing conditions that didn’t buy insurance ahead of time.
Then, in closing out his argument, Dr. Neerhof agrees that health care reform is necessary, but states that it is a lie that 45 million Americans are now uninsured. Dr. Neerhof points out that 37% of those uninsured make over $50,000 a year and could easily afford to buy health insurance if they wanted it. Furthermore, Neerhof explains that 20% of those 45 million are illegal immigrants, and 33% are eligible for some kind of government programs (like SCHIPS or Medicaid). In other words, there are only between 10-15 million Americans that are uninsured and truly can’t afford to buy health insurance. (Later in the debate, Dr. Neerhof suggests using high risk pools subsidized by the government to deal with these truly needy Americans.)
Read more at www.redstate.com
Read more...